Originally posted by DeadParrot
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Bad beat/Moan/Venting Thread - BBV Archive 1
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
People say I should be more humble I hope they understand, they don't listen when you mumble
Get a shiny metal Revolut card! And a free tenner!
https://revolut.com/referral/jamesb8!G10D21
Comment
-
Originally posted by TomD View Post1, in what world would it be 9?
Multiply them = 9.
I think its the way I was taught, do everything inside the brackets first, then everything outside the brackets before applying it to the inside bracket figure.Last edited by ArmaniJeans; 02-05-11, 00:07.
Comment
-
waste of a trip to clonmel
few horrible beats. at home now no fuckin wine in the house only a dribble of JD, might get one out of it1
in a shit mood anyway, dont ask why, just am.( wrong time to be playing online poker)
anyway rant over !Last edited by SatNav; 01-05-11, 23:50.Her sky-ness
© 5starpool
Comment
-
should have gone to mountmelick obviously.X can be anything, any number, that is what’s CRAZY about X.
Because X doesn’t roll like that, because X can’t be pinned down!
$ Free Travel Credit with Airbnb $
Comment
-
Poor Shaggy ripoff imo.
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pSywtiAirKE[/ame]
imoX can be anything, any number, that is what’s CRAZY about X.
Because X doesn’t roll like that, because X can’t be pinned down!
$ Free Travel Credit with Airbnb $
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sometime Happy Dude View Postshould have gone to mountmelick obviously.
met starrbar in clonmel , knew he was going to be there, its funny as i was looking around the place and spotted him and said to myself, bet thats him there and it was lol
psychic obviouslyHer sky-ness
© 5starpool
Comment
-
Originally posted by Lazare View PostCool man, I've never heard that live before.
Here's a well known toon....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bfHtTtCapmE
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F03gEzdLa2g[/ame]"I can’t find anyone who agrees with what I write or think these days, so I guess I must be getting closer to the truth." - Hunter S. Thompson
Comment
-
Originally posted by ArmaniJeans View Post6 div 2 = 3. 1+2 = 3.
Multiply them = 9.
I think its the way I was thought, do everything inside the brackets first, then everything outside the brackets before applying it to the inside bracket figure.
6/2(1+2) is very different from (6/2)(1+2)
Comment
-
Originally posted by AndyFatBastard View PostI quite like a bit of ska but this is the perfect response:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F03gEzdLa2gI hold silver in tit for tat, and I love you for that
Comment
-
Originally posted by TomD View PostI cant agree with this.
6/2(1+2) is very different from (6/2)(1+2)
I'm looking at your 2 examples there and to me they are both 9. I did do my Inter Cert 20 years ago though and they may have changed the rules.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ArmaniJeans View PostI agree totally. I just think it was the way we did it, and it makes logical sense under a different set of rules. I looked at it and came up with 9 instinctively, and I was reasonably capable at the whole maths thing.
I'm looking at your 2 examples there and to me they are both 9. I did do my Inter Cert 20 years ago though and they may have changed the rules.
6 =
2(2+1)
Also, nearly sure you are right to use taught.
Comment
-
I'm bored. Is Pgodkin not involved in an armed robbery somewhere??X can be anything, any number, that is what’s CRAZY about X.
Because X doesn’t roll like that, because X can’t be pinned down!
$ Free Travel Credit with Airbnb $
Comment
-
Originally posted by michelle SatNav View Post
Comment
-
Originally posted by KK82 View PostThat's the secont gayest kid I've ever seen. Only outgayed by the fashion critic kid on the Late Late Toy Show last year.Her sky-ness
© 5starpool
Comment
-
Last edited by nicnicnic; 02-05-11, 00:51.
Comment
-
Originally posted by TomD View PostUFC 129 Main Card - Saturday Night / Sunday Morning
Lightweight bout: Mark Bocek vs. Ben Henderson[1]
Henderson is a stone cold killer in the mould of Jose Aldo, this one will finish hard. Henderson by TKO in the 2nd. Fight of the night.
Light Heavyweight bout: Randy Couture vs. Lyoto Machida[1]
This could be pretty boring with Machida pressed against the cage for a bit of the time and then standing back for the rest. Still expect Machida to get the decision (unless there are judging irregularities)
Light Heavyweight bout: Vladimir Matyushenko vs. Jason Brilz[1]
Brilz has a hrd head and he's going to need it against Vlad, Vlad to cause some damage and eventually get the TKO.
Featherweight Championship bout: José Aldo (c) vs. Mark Hominick[1]
Best fighter in the UFC, Jose Aldo will win by destruction. There are tougher tests ahead and i dont expect Hominik to be up to much. KO of the night.
Welterweight Championship bout: Georges St-Pierre (c) vs. Jake Shields[1]
GSP to pick off Shield on the feet and maybe score a couple of takedowns too. He wont want to spend too long on the ground with Shields though. GSP by decision in front of 55000 home fans.
-Machido: Wowsers, LOLs at Steven Seagal
-Jose Aldo: Adapated well to the bigger cage, he's gonna be champion for a long long time. My favourite fighter by a long way
-GSP: Too good for anyone in the division, needs a proper challenge (or he may be accused becoming boring)
Comment
-
Originally posted by nicnicnic View PostMSN calling me a queer on facebook, I think this pic proves you wrong MSN
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?f...type=1&theater
but as you said i have that lovely big kiss waitingHer sky-ness
© 5starpool
Comment
-
Originally posted by Charlie Sheen View PostThe maths question is constructed poorly, don't let it get to you."I can’t find anyone who agrees with what I write or think these days, so I guess I must be getting closer to the truth." - Hunter S. Thompson
Comment
-
Originally posted by nicnicnic View PostMSN calling me a queer on facebook, I think this pic proves you wrong MSN
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?f...type=1&theater
X can be anything, any number, that is what’s CRAZY about X.
Because X doesn’t roll like that, because X can’t be pinned down!
$ Free Travel Credit with Airbnb $
Comment
-
Originally posted by KK82 View PostThat's the secont gayest kid I've ever seen. Only outgayed by the fashion critic kid on the Late Late Toy Show last year.
Possibly an embedding fail there. Not quite sure how to do it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by nicnicnic View PostMSN calling me a queer on facebook, I think this pic proves you wrong MSN
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?f...type=1&theater
SPOILERHer sky-ness
© 5starpool
Comment
-
Reckon that sum depends on the way you write it:
6 * (1+2) = 9
2____1
or
6 __________ = 1
2 (1+2)This may or may not be an original thought of my own.
All efforts were made to make this thought original but with the abundance of thoughts in the world the originality of this thought cannot be guaranteed.
The author is not liable for any issue arising from the platitudinous nature of this post.
Comment
-
Originally posted by KK82 View PostHow did you embed that? Computer whizz obv.
And on the equation (just to save another 2 pages of it) the answer is 9 according to a maths professor.
I am your college professor that you requested, with a doctorate in Mathematics. I will break this down as simply as possible and end this debate as approx. 10 students have already asked me this today.
The problem as it is written is 6÷2(1+2) , the ÷ cannot be substituted with a fraction bar because they have different ranks on the order of operations. It is an illegal math move to do this. The bar ranks with parentheses, ÷ is interchangeable with *. therefore the problem must be solved as 6÷2(1+2) NOT 6 (over) 2(1+2) we do the parentheses first, so 6÷2(3), the parentheses are now no longer relevant, because the number inside is in it's simplest form. Every single number has implied parentheses around it.
6÷2(3)
(6) ÷(2)(3)
6÷2*3,
or even converting the division to multiplication by a reciprocal (a legal math move)
(6)(1 (over) 2)(3)
are all correct ways to write this problem and mean exactly the same thing. Using pemdas, where md and as are interchangeable, we work from left to right, so (3)(3) or
3*3= 9
Just because something is implied rather than written does not give it any special rank in the order of operations.
The problem in it's simplest form, with nothing implied would look like this:
(1+1+1+1+1+1 (over) 1) ÷ (1+1 (over) 1) * ((1(over) 1) + (1+1 (over) 1))
From here, nothing is implied, This again, works out to 9.
If the symbol '/' was used this whole debate would be ambiguous since that symbol can mean "to divide by" or it could mean a fraction bar.
HOWEVER, because the ÷ symbol is used, it can not be changed to mean a fraction bar because that would change the order of operations and thus the whole problem, you can't change a symbol to mean something because you want to, in doing so you are changing the problem.
Once and for all, the answer is 9.
Hopefully some of my students see this so I can stop answering this question.
End of debate... hopefully.Last edited by hotspur; 02-05-11, 01:19.
Comment
-
Originally posted by hotspur View PostYou just paste the normal Youtube url from your browser window, no fancy embed links.
Anyone see that programme 'The Virgin Diaries' on MTV? Jesus, it's a bit much. It's 17 & 18 year olds doing video diaries as they attempt to lose their virginities. The one on at the moment I've seen before. The girl is desperate to lose it by her 18th birthday.. She meets a guy and decides he is the victim and obsesses over him for a bit. He obv got a bit freaked out and stopped returning her calls. Then she decides she's actually a lesbian. Don't really think the kid's parents should allow their kids to do it. They're a bit to vulnerable and naive and will probably cringe hugely when they see it.
The last kid was gay and was describing how it was a bit painful having another guy inside him for the first time. No way I'd let my kid ever go on that show!
Comment
-
Didnt know that about the division sign (that it couldnt be subbed for / )
Everyday's a school day kids.This may or may not be an original thought of my own.
All efforts were made to make this thought original but with the abundance of thoughts in the world the originality of this thought cannot be guaranteed.
The author is not liable for any issue arising from the platitudinous nature of this post.
Comment
-
Originally posted by KK82 View PostI obviously overthunk it!
Anyone see that programme 'The Virgin Diaries' on MTV? Jesus, it's a bit much. It's 17 & 18 year olds doing video diaries as they attempt to lose their virginities. The one on at the moment I've seen before. The girl is desperate to lose it by her 18th birthday.. She meets a guy and decides he is the victim and obsesses over him for a bit. He obv got a bit freaked out and stopped returning her calls. Then she decides she's actually a lesbian. Don't really think the kid's parents should allow their kids to do it. They're a bit to vulnerable and naive and will probably cringe hugely when they see it.
The last kid was gay and was describing how it was a bit painful having another guy inside him for the first time. No way I'd let my kid ever go on that show!Her sky-ness
© 5starpool
Comment
Comment