A situation similar to this came up over the weekend at the Norwegian Open in Citywest.
After some raising and shoving in a plo game 1 player ends up all in for €400 with 2 callers.
I caller has €125 behind and the other caller has more than that.
They both check a random rainbow flop
The turn makes the possibility of a straight and also puts a flush draw out there, this is where it gets interesting....
The first caller moves all in for his €125 and says something in Norwegian, the second player says something back in Norwegian and the dealer presumes that he called and turns the river which fills the flush.
The second caller then complains that he has not called yet and a ruling is called where it is ruled that the river card is to be put back in the pack reshuffled and the second caller has the option to call or fold.
The second caller now elects to call and the dealer re deals the river which is a complete brick.
The second caller now turns over his hand which is the nut straight.
I realise that there should be no other language other than English used and I also know that the dealer should have not dealt the river until he had created the side pot so there is need for loads of serial posters to post about that.
The question is after seeing that the second caller had the nuts on the turn and was obviously going to call the €125 should some action have been taken on him retrospectively?
After some raising and shoving in a plo game 1 player ends up all in for €400 with 2 callers.
I caller has €125 behind and the other caller has more than that.
They both check a random rainbow flop
The turn makes the possibility of a straight and also puts a flush draw out there, this is where it gets interesting....
The first caller moves all in for his €125 and says something in Norwegian, the second player says something back in Norwegian and the dealer presumes that he called and turns the river which fills the flush.
The second caller then complains that he has not called yet and a ruling is called where it is ruled that the river card is to be put back in the pack reshuffled and the second caller has the option to call or fold.
The second caller now elects to call and the dealer re deals the river which is a complete brick.
The second caller now turns over his hand which is the nut straight.
I realise that there should be no other language other than English used and I also know that the dealer should have not dealt the river until he had created the side pot so there is need for loads of serial posters to post about that.
The question is after seeing that the second caller had the nuts on the turn and was obviously going to call the €125 should some action have been taken on him retrospectively?
Comment