Also, the first ever NBA game I watched was game 1 last week, very good. Game 2 was class, that little lad with the head band was excellent. Lets got Celtics imo.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Bad beat/Moan/Venting Thread - BBV Archive 1
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Originally posted by Teddie View PostAlso, the first ever NBA game I watched was game 1 last week, very good. Game 2 was class, that little lad with the head band was excellent. Lets got Celtics imo.'Mental Toughness is doing the right thing for the team when it's not the best thing for you' - Bill Belichick
Comment
-
Originally posted by Opr View PostAnyone got a good link for the NBA one I have is rubbish ?
Opr
Comment
-
Originally posted by Lafortezza View Posthttp://www.atdhe.net/ a couple there, don't seem to be amazing quality though. I think it's on ESPN on NTL if you have it.
Opr
Comment
-
Originally posted by ionapaul View PostYay, FT on two tournies on Stars right now..could be a good night One is a sat with a flat prize but I'm in for $8 and the seat value is $108 so pretty sweet!
It's been a good night grinding! I'm obviously on a retirement heater!
Comment
-
Guest
Just spotted 2 guys appaering to soft play ina sng in i poker so checked there head to head on sharkscope
one guy has played 341 games 334 in same games as his mate obv collusion here whats best way to report it to the powers that be at ipoker not playing in an irish skin at present any sugguestions.?
Comment
-
Originally posted by SICKPUPPY View PostJust spotted 2 guys appaering to soft play ina sng in i poker so checked there head to head on sharkscope
one guy has played 341 games 334 in same games as his mate obv collusion here whats best way to report it to the powers that be at ipoker not playing in an irish skin at present any sugguestions.?
Comment
-
Originally posted by SICKPUPPY View PostJust spotted 2 guys appaering to soft play ina sng in i poker so checked there head to head on sharkscope
one guy has played 341 games 334 in same games as his mate obv collusion here whats best way to report it to the powers that be at ipoker not playing in an irish skin at present any sugguestions.?
Comment
-
Originally posted by SICKPUPPY View PostJust spotted 2 guys appaering to soft play ina sng in i poker so checked there head to head on sharkscope
one guy has played 341 games 334 in same games as his mate obv collusion here whats best way to report it to the powers that be at ipoker not playing in an irish skin at present any sugguestions.?
Comment
-
Yeah Ray Allen and Paul Pierce went missing, that has happened too often this season.
I'm sick after that, after such a great fightback. And it could all have been so different too only for that terrible timeout call from Doc.'Mental Toughness is doing the right thing for the team when it's not the best thing for you' - Bill Belichick
Comment
-
Originally posted by jbravado View PostHJ I would stilll take some action on Torres leaving. Still. Surely youll bite the hand off this. Trying to get rid of the loots!!!
Comment
-
Originally posted by eight-ball View Postyeah i tried to withdraw €500 there a while back and they wanted allsorts of photo id, photocopies of my credit card and proof of address. i was reluctant to give this information, as there is enough info in those documents to apply for a credit card or open a bank account in my name. so i emailed support and they wouldn't budge on the amt of info required. so anyhow after several emails outlining my concerns they eventually accepted a photocopy of my drivers licence and my credit card both sides btw so i emptied my a/c which was 1200 at the time, cancelled my credit card and didn't play there since.
now my story is that 20years ago when i was living in sydney i shared a house with a bunch off lads, one of them was an insurance salesman and his scam was to sell some unsuspecting guy insurance and get him to fill out the forms there was enough of info in these forms for my house mate to apply and get credit/cards in his customers names. he used to even set up direct debit payments from his customers bank a/c to make the monthly payments on a credit card that he never even knew he had let alone never used. sometimes he would get away with 5 or 6 mths before the card would get cancelled, and then he would only go and get another one in someone elses name and keep it going until it got cancelled again. he eventually got a conscious and gave it up after 3 years.
that was my experience of carbon poker. while the site itself might adhere to strict security the guy working for them could still shaft you with access to that kind of info. bottom line if they don't require that level of info to withdraw from your card then they shouldn't need it to make a payment to your card.
i play on ppp,ps and ft and none of them ever asked for that level of info
I will never play there again, joke to be honest. Getting the rest out better not be as much a nightmare as this though.This may or may not be an original thought of my own.
All efforts were made to make this thought original but with the abundance of thoughts in the world the originality of this thought cannot be guaranteed.
The author is not liable for any issue arising from the platitudinous nature of this post.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Solskjaer View Postmr american cliche calls me unoriginal,
is it my fault my opinion is considered by others, get off yer feckig high horse. What original post have you made on the subject that is also not prevalent on most feckng footie forums.
sure did you not call the opinion tripe, who the feck are you to call anyone opinion tripe, writing fecking soundbites to make your points, LOL
the confused smiley is my opinion IS different , what a useless point to make and thank.
I also love ACDC is it ok if the media agree with me. LMAO
let you guys have the last word, have to wonder though if my pov is so unoriginal why do people spend so much time correcting it. been done no ?"Worldly wisdom teaches that it is better for reputation to fail conventionally than to succeed unconventionally." - John Maynard Keynes
Comment
-
Just to weigh in on the Rafa thing. I'm not a Liverpool fan (obv. wolves) but I do like to see them do well. They have been my fav. team in the premiership most seasons and I watched a lot of their games.
They should have won the league 2 seasons ago and didn't almost entirely on Rafa's bad tactical decisions. There is no doubt he can make a team play well against other good teams but so many draws against poor teams cost them the title. He's a defensive minded manager and when he had the squad to attack, and they were in form, he didn't use them right. As for last season they were just painful to watch, brutal at times. Personally, I am glad he's gone.
Comment
-
Guest
Originally posted by Hitchhiker's Guide to... View PostWithout knowing anything about football, got to say that Solskjaer wins the liverpool posting.
Originally posted by Hitchhiker's Guide to... View PostWithout knowing anything about football
Comment
-
Originally posted by Wolves View PostJust to weigh in on the Rafa thing. I'm not a Liverpool fan (obv. wolves) but I do like to see them do well. They have been my fav. team in the premiership most seasons and I watched a lot of their games.
They should have won the league 2 seasons ago and didn't almost entirely on Rafa's bad tactical decisions. There is no doubt he can make a team play well against other good teams but so many draws against poor teams cost them the title. He's a defensive minded manager and when he had the squad to attack, and they were in form, he didn't use them right. As for last season they were just painful to watch, brutal at times. Personally, I am glad he's gone.
No doubt they should have won several of those draw games, but they should also have lost/drawn some other games that they won through last minute goals, particularly early in the season, or were these 'lucky' in spite of Rafa as well?
Comment
-
Originally posted by 5starpool View PostSo when Liverpool didn't win it was Rafas tactical ineptitude, and when he did win it was the players who get the credit? No wonder the man can't get ahead.
No doubt they should have won several of those draw games, but they should also have lost/drawn some other games that they won through last minute goals, particularly early in the season, or were these 'lucky' in spite of Rafa as well?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Elshambo View PostThat would probably be because ye share the same viewing point with regard to said sport
I've forgotten more than most of you chimps fecking know. I rubbed shoulders with many a Liverpool fan in the 1980s and reading the muck on here it is clear you loyaltys are not to a club but to some fecking spanish waiter. How fecking sad is that.
GFTO IMO.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Solskjaer View PostStick it up yer gash.
I've forgotten more than most of you chimps fecking know. I rubbed shoulders with many a Liverpool fan in the 1980s and reading the muck on here it is clear you loyaltys are not to a club but to some fecking spanish waiter. How fecking sad is that.
GFTO IMO.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Opr View PostYou have this inability to listen to anyone else's point when it comes to football. I mean I have problems relating to Rafa but rarely those trotted out by the media and the old Fergie chestnut as you like to call it is trotted out because their are huge parallels. The difference being the guy had a bottomless pit on which to draw on to make a success of United.
This is a post which informed me on his spending and how badly he did in his early years with United.
way back in 1989 (some 20 years ago!) alex spent £13m on new signings as he was "building" a new united team..liverpool, in the previous 10 years hadnt spent as much.it was his 4th season at the club and as yet he hadnt won a thing. paul ince, neil webb, gary pallister (record fee for a defender) mike phelan and danny wallace ALL cost over £1m and in the case of pallister £2.2m. the combined outlay on new players took alexs spending to £13m. not alot now you would say, but just an example of how much money that was back then is the fact that michael knighton was on the verge of buying out martin edwards and buying the entire club and was priced £10m to buy the club.
Wallace £1.2m
Pallister £2.3m
Webb £1.5m
Ince £1.5m
So that year he spent £7.25m
In the previous two years he spent £5m
So it's close to £13m at £12.25m, but £750k in those days would buy you 3/4 of a Cantona or a full Denis Irwin for that matter so it all counts!!!
He also made over £5m in transfer fess from selling players during those years and overhauled an aging drink fuelled side while he was at it!
I'm not arguing against Benitez btw, but arguing that Fegie had a bottomless pit compared to Rafa when their % net spend over the first 5-6 years is very similar is a bogus argument.
Comment
-
I sent an email to pokerstars support last night asking them to turn off my doomswitch because i was running so bad :-) I withdrew $5k from my account a couple of weeks ago and i somehow managed to go the next 53 tournaments without cashing.
I'm always interested to hear what pokerstars have to say, and despite not thinking that pokerstars was rigged, the main purpose of my mail was to include that over the last 2 weeks, i've had over 25 transactions coming in and out (due to sheep games/sweeps) and because i also play half my time on 2 IPs addresses due to living in Letterkenny and working in Dublin. I've also had 2 failed attempts to transfer money to someone who's account was locked for real money transfers. Was just making sure that there was nothing flagged on my account.
As usual, their response was top of the range.
Hello Tony,
Thank you for your email and allowing me to address your concerns.
As much as it might be a convenient explanation for when you receive a bad
beat, there is no such thing as a "doomswitch". It is simply a fanciful term
invented by players, who in the early days of online poker, were seeking to
explain away their poor results by blaming factors other than the natural
randomness that occurs in the game (and perhaps poor skill).
PokerStars has no control over who wins and loses at our tables, and we
cannot determine how your hole cards, the flop, turn and river are going to
be dealt. We just deal the cards and the rest is up to the players in the game.
Further, as you undoubtedly know, poker is a game of high variance (with a
very large range of possible results), in which every player will encounter
periodical upswings and downswings. It is inevitable that for some players
these swings will occur at the same time as other events, such as a software
update, a chat revocation, a chip rebuy, a cashout, or even an email to
Support. Although it may seem evident to some players that there is a link
between such events, the truth is that they are totally unrelated. I can
assure you that transfers to and from your account have no bearing on your
results.
The truth is, we only facilitate the game by dealing the cards in a fair,
honest and random manner. PokerStars has never influenced or altered the
outcome of any hand. We had two independent auditors who reviewed our shuffle
algorithm and found it sound and random. You may read the analyses of these
auditors at:
You have reached a page at PokerStars™ which no longer exists. Visit our homepage or the sitemap to find the page you're looking for.
Again, in over 40,000,000,000 hands not once has anybody found any
indication that our shuffle is not 100% random yet many people have
undertaken studies otherwise. You may find just two of them here:
This is not PokerStars shouting "we are random", these are *independent
reviews*.
If you wish to put your mind at ease, you may simply request the 252,037
hands you have played at PokerStars and review them for any statistical
anomalies. You can input them into some independent poker analysis software,
such as PokerTracker, PokerOffice, or Hold'em Manager (free trial versions
are available). These programs can then show you easy-to-read reports
covering all your results, plus a large number of other statistics on the
hands you have been dealt, your play, and the play of your opponents. Your
own hand histories will clearly show our shuffle is random.
We hope this information helps you to understand that PokerStars' games are
fair. We value all of our players, and take the integrity of our site very
seriously.
Starting cards:
Total hands you were dealt cards: 125852
All suited starters dealt: 29595 (23.52%)
All suited starters expected: 29612 (23.5%)
All connected starters dealt: 19493 (15.49%)
All connected starters expected: 19741 (15.7%)
Suited connector starters dealt: 4837 (3.84%)
Suited connector starters expected: 4935 (3.92%)
Paired starters dealt: 7364 (5.851%)
Paired starters expected: 7403 (5.88%)
AKo dealt: 1202 (0.955%)
AKo expected: 1139 (0.905%)
AKs dealt: 373 (0.296%)
AKs expected: 380 (0.302%)
Any AK dealt: 1575 (1.251%)
Any AK expected: 1519 (1.21%)
A's dealt: 603 (0.479%)
K's dealt: 543 (0.431%)
Q's dealt: 558 (0.443%)
J's dealt: 551 (0.438%)
T's dealt: 546 (0.434%)
9's dealt: 585 (0.465%)
8's dealt: 568 (0.451%)
7's dealt: 597 (0.474%)
6's dealt: 542 (0.431%)
5's dealt: 532 (0.423%)
4's dealt: 603 (0.479%)
3's dealt: 582 (0.462%)
2's dealt: 554 (0.440%)
Each pair expected: 569 (0.452%)
(Note that only data for hands where a flop was dealt and you
were dealt cards preflop are used. Hands where no flop was dealt
are skipped.)
Total hands you were dealt cards: 125852
Times a flop dealt when you were dealt cards: 80610 (64.05%)
When user dealt AK, flops at least one A or K: 346 (33.11%)
expected: 339 (32.4%)
USER HAS ANY TWO SUITED CARDS (dealt 19446 times):
Using both user's hole cards, flopped a:
3 flush: 8164 (41.98%) expected: 8087 (41.6%)
4 flush: 2226 (11.45%) expected: 2128 (10.9%)
5 flush: 147 (0.76%) expected: 164 (0.842%)
Three cards on the flop make up a:
3 straight: 612 (3.15%) expected: 620 (3.18%)
2 flush: 10728 (55.17%) expected: 10718 (55.1%)
3 flush: 981 (5.04%) expected: 1015 (05.22%)
any pair: 3303 (16.99%) expected: 3292 (16.9%)
Hand user flops:
High card: 10257 (52.7%) expected: 10233 (52.6%)
Pair: 7868 (40.5%) expected: 7858 (40.4%)
Two pair: 757 (3.89%) expected: 786 (4.04%)
3 of a kind: 302 (1.55%) expected: 306 (1.57%)
Straight: 97 (0.50%) expected: 80 (0.412%)
Flush: 147 (0.76%) expected: 162 (0.835%)
Full house: 15 (0.077%) expected: 18 (0.0918%)
Four of a kind: 3 (0.015%) expected: 2 (0.0102%)
Straight flush: 0 (0.000%) expected: 1 (0.00589%)
Royal flush: 0 (0.000%) expected: 0 (0.000654%)
USER HAS ANY PAIR (dealt 5218 times):
Using both user's hole cards, flopped a:
Underpair (to flop): 1224 (23.46%) expected: 1225 (23.5%)
Overpair (to flop): 1215 (23.28%) expected: 1225 (23.5%)
Set: 647 (12.40%) expected: 601 (11.51%)
Quads: 5 (0.096%) expected: 13 (0.245%)
Three cards on the flop make up a:
3 straight: 168 (3.22%) expected: 166 (3.18%)
2 flush: 2860 (54.81%) expected: 2872 (55.0%)
3 flush: 305 (5.85%) expected: 269 (5.16%)
any pair: 896 (17.17%) expected: 895 (17.1%)
Hand user flops:
High card: 0 (0.0%) expected: 0 (0.00%)
Pair: 3707 (71.0%) expected: 3748 (71.8%)
Two pair: 841 (16.12%) expected: 843 (16.2%)
3 of a kind: 597 (11.44%) expected: 562 (10.8%)
Straight: 0 (0.00%) expected: 0
(0.00%)
Flush: 0 (0.00%) expected: 0 (0.00%)
Full house: 68 (1.303%) expected: 51 (0.980%)
Four of a kind: 5 (0.096%) expected: 13 (0.245%)
Straight flush: 0 (0.000%) expected: 0 (0.00%)
Royal flush: 0 (0.000%) expected: 0 (0.00%)
USER HAS OFFSUIT CONNECTORS FROM 54o to JTo (dealt 5026 times):
Using both user's hole cards, flopped a:
Open ended: 414 (8.24%) expected: 430 (8.55%)
Double belly: 24 (0.48%) expected: 27 (0.531%)
Straight: 70 (1.39%) expected: 63 (1.26%)
Three cards on the flop make up a:
3 straight: 180 (3.58%) expected: 158 (3.15%)
2 flush: 2804 (55.79%) expected: 2766 (55.0%)
3 flush: 259 (5.15%) expected: 260 (5.16%)
any pair: 852 (16.95%) expected: 851 (16.9%)
Hand user flops:
High card: 2641 (52.5%) expected: 2646 (52.6%)
Pair: 2025 (40.3%) expected: 2031 (40.4%)
Two pair: 200 (3.98%) expected: 203 (4.04%)
3 of a kind: 87 (1.73%) expected: 79 (1.57%)
Straight: 72 (1.43%) expected: 62 (1.23%)
Flush: 0 (0.00%) expected: 0 (0.00%)
Full house: 1 (0.020%) expected: 5 (0.0918%)
Four of a kind: 0 (0.000%) expected: 1 (0.0102%)
Straight flush: 0 (0.000%) expected: 0 (0.00%)
Royal flush: 0 (0.000%) expected: 0 (0.00%)
ALL FLOPS SEEN BY THE USER:
Three cards on the flop make up a:
3 straight: 2630 (3.26%) expected: 2568 (3.19%)
2 flush: 44329 (54.99%) expected: 44383 (55.1%)
3 flush: 4176 (5.18%) expected: 4173 (5.18%)
any pair: 13699 (16.99%) expected: 13656 (16.9%)
Hand user flops:
High card: 40153 (49.8%) expected: 40400 (50.1%)
Pair: 34179 (42.4%) expected: 34063 (42.3%)
Two pair: 3863 (4.79%) expected: 3832 (4.75%)
3 of a kind: 1770 (2.20%) expected: 1703 (2.11%)
Straight: 357 (0.44%) expected: 316 (0.392%)
Flush: 147 (0.18%) expected: 158 (0.197%)
Full house: 131 (0.163%) expected: 116 (0.144%)
Four of a kind: 10 (0.012%) expected: 19 (0.0240%)
Straight flush: 0 (0.000%) expected: 1 (0.00139%)
Royal flush: 0 (0.000%) expected: 0 (0.000154%)
(Note that only data for hands where a river was dealt and you
were dealt cards preflop are used. Hands where no river was dealt
are skipped.)
Total hands you were dealt cards: 125852
Total final boards seen when you were dealt cards: 44325
USER HAS ANY TWO SUITED CARDS (dealt 10628 times):
Four flushes flopped: 1262 (11.87%)
expected: 1163 (10.9%)
When flop four flush, got flush: 464 (36.77%)
expected: 441 (35.0%)
Hand user has at river:
High card: 1871 (17.6%) expected: 1852 (17.4%)
Pair: 4465 (42.0%) expected: 4532 (42.6%)
Two pair: 2290 (21.55%) expected: 2349 (22.1%)
3 of a kind: 463 (4.36%) expected: 461 (4.33%)
Straight: 494 (4.65%) expected: 484 (4.56%)
Flush: 786 (7.40%) expected: 692 (6.51%)
Full house: 236 (2.221%) expected: 236 (2.22%)
Four of a kind: 15 (0.141%) expected: 13 (0.126%)
Straight flush: 7 (0.066%) expected: 7 (0.0663%)
Royal flush: 1 (0.009%) expected: 1 (0.00781%)
USER HAS ANY PAIR (dealt 3264 times):
A set flopped: 470 (14.40%)
expected: 368 (11.3%)
When flop set, got boat or quads: 153 (32.55%)
expected: 157 (33.4%)
Hand user has at river:
High card: 0 (0.0%) expected: 0 (0.00%)
Pair: 1126 (34.5%) expected: 1158 (35.5%)
Two pair: 1253 (38.39%) expected: 1290 (39.5%)
3 of a kind: 435 (13.33%) expected: 383 (11.7%)
Straight: 45 (1.38%) expected: 62 (1.90%)
Flush: 63 (1.93%) expected: 64 (1.95%)
Full house: 316 (9.681%) expected: 279 (8.54%)
Four of a kind: 26 (0.797%) expected: 27 (0.842%)
Straight flush: 0 (0.000%) expected: 1 (0.0160%)
Royal flush: 0 (0.000%) expected: 0 (0.00182%)
USER HAS OFFSUIT CONNECTORS FROM 54o to JTo (dealt 2655 times):
Flopped open ended: 244 (9.19%)
expected: 227 (8.55%)
When open ended, got straight: 69 (28.28%)
expected: 75 (30.7%)
Hand user has at river:
High card: 445 (16.8%) expected: 457 (17.2%)
Pair: 1140 (42.9%) expected: 1135 (42.7%)
Two pair: 561 (21.13%) expected: 591 (22.3%)
3 of a kind: 112 (4.22%) expected: 115 (4.35%)
Straight: 259 (9.76%) expected: 242 (9.12%)
Flush: 60 (2.26%) expected: 52 (1.95%)
Full house: 72 (2.712%) expected: 59 (2.22%)
Four of a kind: 5 (0.188%) expected: 3 (0.126%)
Straight flush: 1 (0.038%) expected: 1 (0.0209%)
Royal flush: 0 (0.000%) expected: 0 (0.00110%)
ALL RIVERS SEEN BY THE USER:
Hand user has at river:
High card: 7614 (17.2%) expected: 7718 (17.4%)
Pair: 19268 (43.5%) expected: 19424 (43.8%)
Two pair: 10327 (23.30%) expected: 10414
(23.5%)
3 of a kind: 2271 (5.12%) expected: 2141 (4.83%)
Straight: 2095 (4.73%) expected: 2048 (4.62%)
Flush: 1468 (3.31%) expected: 1341 (3.03%)
Full house: 1195 (2.696%) expected: 1151 (2.60%)
Four of a kind: 74 (0.167%) expected: 74 (0.168%)
Straight flush: 12 (0.027%) expected: 12 (0.0279%)
Royal flush: 1 (0.002%) expected: 1 (0.00323%)
Four to a flush on board 2042 (4.607%)
expected: 1902 (4.29%)
Comment
-
Guest
Originally posted by Solskjaer View PostStick it up yer gash.
I've forgotten more than most of you chimps fecking know. I rubbed shoulders with many a Liverpool fan in the 1980s and reading the muck on here it is clear you loyaltys are not to a club but to some fecking spanish waiter. How fecking sad is that.
GFTO IMO.
Comment
-
Talking about spending in the early 90s late 80s just cant be compared to transfers of today. Todays transfers are all over inflated due to money in modern football an average english player like barry can cost 15million plus. You can however compare quailty.
Im not going to get into any specfics other than in my opinion Rafa should have stayed because currently they cant get anyone better. I support a team who have had since rafa took over in 2004 Erick Black, Peter Reid, Micky Adams, Ian Dowie, Chris Coleman and now Aidi Boothroyd along with another 3 caretaker managers who added together were in charge for about a season.
While i dont champion any of these managers no replacement has ever looked to me like a major step up and as such new manager has come in and build his own team for a year done average and been replaced. It is this attitude from english football clubs that leads to them struggling. Stabilty is how you build success.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hitchhiker's Guide to... View Postfairly certain I asked the gf to marry me, but may have covered it up with the five-day binge. She refused to wear white anyway (according to the skype messages), which is reasonably honest of her. Hope this doesn't affect the threesome!
I wonder was that an attempt to cement the threesome or to try and put it off???
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hitchhiker's Guide to... View Postfairly certain I asked the gf to marry me, but may have covered it up with the five-day binge. She refused to wear white anyway (according to the skype messages), which is reasonably honest of her. Hope this doesn't affect the threesome!
"You said I'm the only woman you want to share your life with!"
"Yes! My life with, not my bed!"
Congrats all the same.You are technically correct...the best kind of correct
World Record Holder for Long Distance Soul Reads: May 7th 2011
Comment
-
Originally posted by Flushdraw View PostI sent an email to pokerstars support last night asking them to turn off my doomswitch because i was running so bad :-) I withdrew $5k from my account a couple of weeks ago and i somehow managed to go the next 53 tournaments without cashing.
I'm always interested to hear what pokerstars have to say, and despite not thinking that pokerstars was rigged, the main purpose of my mail was to include that over the last 2 weeks, i've had over 25 transactions coming in and out (due to sheep games/sweeps) and because i also play half my time on 2 IPs addresses due to living in Letterkenny and working in Dublin. I've also had 2 failed attempts to transfer money to someone who's account was locked for real money transfers. Was just making sure that there was nothing flagged on my account.
As usual, their response was top of the range.
I clicked on one the links above, and the results are pretty interesting.
Starting cards:
Total hands you were dealt cards: 125852
All suited starters dealt: 29595 (23.52%)
All suited starters expected: 29612 (23.5%)
All connected starters dealt: 19493 (15.49%)
All connected starters expected: 19741 (15.7%)
Suited connector starters dealt: 4837 (3.84%)
Suited connector starters expected: 4935 (3.92%)
Paired starters dealt: 7364 (5.851%)
Paired starters expected: 7403 (5.88%)
AKo dealt: 1202 (0.955%)
AKo expected: 1139 (0.905%)
AKs dealt: 373 (0.296%)
AKs expected: 380 (0.302%)
Any AK dealt: 1575 (1.251%)
Any AK expected: 1519 (1.21%)
A's dealt: 603 (0.479%)
K's dealt: 543 (0.431%)
Q's dealt: 558 (0.443%)
J's dealt: 551 (0.438%)
T's dealt: 546 (0.434%)
9's dealt: 585 (0.465%)
8's dealt: 568 (0.451%)
7's dealt: 597 (0.474%)
6's dealt: 542 (0.431%)
5's dealt: 532 (0.423%)
4's dealt: 603 (0.479%)
3's dealt: 582 (0.462%)
2's dealt: 554 (0.440%)
Each pair expected: 569 (0.452%)
(Note that only data for hands where a flop was dealt and you
were dealt cards preflop are used. Hands where no flop was dealt
are skipped.)
Total hands you were dealt cards: 125852
Times a flop dealt when you were dealt cards: 80610 (64.05%)
When user dealt AK, flops at least one A or K: 346 (33.11%)
expected: 339 (32.4%)
USER HAS ANY TWO SUITED CARDS (dealt 19446 times):
Using both user's hole cards, flopped a:
3 flush: 8164 (41.98%) expected: 8087 (41.6%)
4 flush: 2226 (11.45%) expected: 2128 (10.9%)
5 flush: 147 (0.76%) expected: 164 (0.842%)
Three cards on the flop make up a:
3 straight: 612 (3.15%) expected: 620 (3.18%)
2 flush: 10728 (55.17%) expected: 10718 (55.1%)
3 flush: 981 (5.04%) expected: 1015 (05.22%)
any pair: 3303 (16.99%) expected: 3292 (16.9%)
Hand user flops:
High card: 10257 (52.7%) expected: 10233 (52.6%)
Pair: 7868 (40.5%) expected: 7858 (40.4%)
Two pair: 757 (3.89%) expected: 786 (4.04%)
3 of a kind: 302 (1.55%) expected: 306 (1.57%)
Straight: 97 (0.50%) expected: 80 (0.412%)
Flush: 147 (0.76%) expected: 162 (0.835%)
Full house: 15 (0.077%) expected: 18 (0.0918%)
Four of a kind: 3 (0.015%) expected: 2 (0.0102%)
Straight flush: 0 (0.000%) expected: 1 (0.00589%)
Royal flush: 0 (0.000%) expected: 0 (0.000654%)
USER HAS ANY PAIR (dealt 5218 times):
Using both user's hole cards, flopped a:
Underpair (to flop): 1224 (23.46%) expected: 1225 (23.5%)
Overpair (to flop): 1215 (23.28%) expected: 1225 (23.5%)
Set: 647 (12.40%) expected: 601 (11.51%)
Quads: 5 (0.096%) expected: 13 (0.245%)
Three cards on the flop make up a:
3 straight: 168 (3.22%) expected: 166 (3.18%)
2 flush: 2860 (54.81%) expected: 2872 (55.0%)
3 flush: 305 (5.85%) expected: 269 (5.16%)
any pair: 896 (17.17%) expected: 895 (17.1%)
Hand user flops:
High card: 0 (0.0%) expected: 0 (0.00%)
Pair: 3707 (71.0%) expected: 3748 (71.8%)
Two pair: 841 (16.12%) expected: 843 (16.2%)
3 of a kind: 597 (11.44%) expected: 562 (10.8%)
Straight: 0 (0.00%) expected: 0
(0.00%)
Flush: 0 (0.00%) expected: 0 (0.00%)
Full house: 68 (1.303%) expected: 51 (0.980%)
Four of a kind: 5 (0.096%) expected: 13 (0.245%)
Straight flush: 0 (0.000%) expected: 0 (0.00%)
Royal flush: 0 (0.000%) expected: 0 (0.00%)
USER HAS OFFSUIT CONNECTORS FROM 54o to JTo (dealt 5026 times):
Using both user's hole cards, flopped a:
Open ended: 414 (8.24%) expected: 430 (8.55%)
Double belly: 24 (0.48%) expected: 27 (0.531%)
Straight: 70 (1.39%) expected: 63 (1.26%)
Three cards on the flop make up a:
3 straight: 180 (3.58%) expected: 158 (3.15%)
2 flush: 2804 (55.79%) expected: 2766 (55.0%)
3 flush: 259 (5.15%) expected: 260 (5.16%)
any pair: 852 (16.95%) expected: 851 (16.9%)
Hand user flops:
High card: 2641 (52.5%) expected: 2646 (52.6%)
Pair: 2025 (40.3%) expected: 2031 (40.4%)
Two pair: 200 (3.98%) expected: 203 (4.04%)
3 of a kind: 87 (1.73%) expected: 79 (1.57%)
Straight: 72 (1.43%) expected: 62 (1.23%)
Flush: 0 (0.00%) expected: 0 (0.00%)
Full house: 1 (0.020%) expected: 5 (0.0918%)
Four of a kind: 0 (0.000%) expected: 1 (0.0102%)
Straight flush: 0 (0.000%) expected: 0 (0.00%)
Royal flush: 0 (0.000%) expected: 0 (0.00%)
ALL FLOPS SEEN BY THE USER:
Three cards on the flop make up a:
3 straight: 2630 (3.26%) expected: 2568 (3.19%)
2 flush: 44329 (54.99%) expected: 44383 (55.1%)
3 flush: 4176 (5.18%) expected: 4173 (5.18%)
any pair: 13699 (16.99%) expected: 13656 (16.9%)
Hand user flops:
High card: 40153 (49.8%) expected: 40400 (50.1%)
Pair: 34179 (42.4%) expected: 34063 (42.3%)
Two pair: 3863 (4.79%) expected: 3832 (4.75%)
3 of a kind: 1770 (2.20%) expected: 1703 (2.11%)
Straight: 357 (0.44%) expected: 316 (0.392%)
Flush: 147 (0.18%) expected: 158 (0.197%)
Full house: 131 (0.163%) expected: 116 (0.144%)
Four of a kind: 10 (0.012%) expected: 19 (0.0240%)
Straight flush: 0 (0.000%) expected: 1 (0.00139%)
Royal flush: 0 (0.000%) expected: 0 (0.000154%)
(Note that only data for hands where a river was dealt and you
were dealt cards preflop are used. Hands where no river was dealt
are skipped.)
Total hands you were dealt cards: 125852
Total final boards seen when you were dealt cards: 44325
USER HAS ANY TWO SUITED CARDS (dealt 10628 times):
Four flushes flopped: 1262 (11.87%)
expected: 1163 (10.9%)
When flop four flush, got flush: 464 (36.77%)
expected: 441 (35.0%)
Hand user has at river:
High card: 1871 (17.6%) expected: 1852 (17.4%)
Pair: 4465 (42.0%) expected: 4532 (42.6%)
Two pair: 2290 (21.55%) expected: 2349 (22.1%)
3 of a kind: 463 (4.36%) expected: 461 (4.33%)
Straight: 494 (4.65%) expected: 484 (4.56%)
Flush: 786 (7.40%) expected: 692 (6.51%)
Full house: 236 (2.221%) expected: 236 (2.22%)
Four of a kind: 15 (0.141%) expected: 13 (0.126%)
Straight flush: 7 (0.066%) expected: 7 (0.0663%)
Royal flush: 1 (0.009%) expected: 1 (0.00781%)
USER HAS ANY PAIR (dealt 3264 times):
A set flopped: 470 (14.40%)
expected: 368 (11.3%)
When flop set, got boat or quads: 153 (32.55%)
expected: 157 (33.4%)
Hand user has at river:
High card: 0 (0.0%) expected: 0 (0.00%)
Pair: 1126 (34.5%) expected: 1158 (35.5%)
Two pair: 1253 (38.39%) expected: 1290 (39.5%)
3 of a kind: 435 (13.33%) expected: 383 (11.7%)
Straight: 45 (1.38%) expected: 62 (1.90%)
Flush: 63 (1.93%) expected: 64 (1.95%)
Full house: 316 (9.681%) expected: 279 (8.54%)
Four of a kind: 26 (0.797%) expected: 27 (0.842%)
Straight flush: 0 (0.000%) expected: 1 (0.0160%)
Royal flush: 0 (0.000%) expected: 0 (0.00182%)
USER HAS OFFSUIT CONNECTORS FROM 54o to JTo (dealt 2655 times):
Flopped open ended: 244 (9.19%)
expected: 227 (8.55%)
When open ended, got straight: 69 (28.28%)
expected: 75 (30.7%)
Hand user has at river:
High card: 445 (16.8%) expected: 457 (17.2%)
Pair: 1140 (42.9%) expected: 1135 (42.7%)
Two pair: 561 (21.13%) expected: 591 (22.3%)
3 of a kind: 112 (4.22%) expected: 115 (4.35%)
Straight: 259 (9.76%) expected: 242 (9.12%)
Flush: 60 (2.26%) expected: 52 (1.95%)
Full house: 72 (2.712%) expected: 59 (2.22%)
Four of a kind: 5 (0.188%) expected: 3 (0.126%)
Straight flush: 1 (0.038%) expected: 1 (0.0209%)
Royal flush: 0 (0.000%) expected: 0 (0.00110%)
ALL RIVERS SEEN BY THE USER:
Hand user has at river:
High card: 7614 (17.2%) expected: 7718 (17.4%)
Pair: 19268 (43.5%) expected: 19424 (43.8%)
Two pair: 10327 (23.30%) expected: 10414
(23.5%)
3 of a kind: 2271 (5.12%) expected: 2141 (4.83%)
Straight: 2095 (4.73%) expected: 2048 (4.62%)
Flush: 1468 (3.31%) expected: 1341 (3.03%)
Full house: 1195 (2.696%) expected: 1151 (2.60%)
Four of a kind: 74 (0.167%) expected: 74 (0.168%)
Straight flush: 12 (0.027%) expected: 12 (0.0279%)
Royal flush: 1 (0.002%) expected: 1 (0.00323%)
Four to a flush on board 2042 (4.607%)
expected: 1902 (4.29%)
Comment
-
Originally posted by Iago View PostPhelan £750k
Wallace £1.2m
Pallister £2.3m
Webb £1.5m
Ince £1.5m
So that year he spent £7.25m
In the previous two years he spent £5m
So it's close to £13m at £12.25m, but £750k in those days would buy you 3/4 of a Cantona or a full Denis Irwin for that matter so it all counts!!!
He also made over £5m in transfer fess from selling players during those years and overhauled an aging drink fuelled side while he was at it!
I'm not arguing against Benitez btw, but arguing that Fegie had a bottomless pit compared to Rafa when their % net spend over the first 5-6 years is very similar is a bogus argument.
The article extrapolates that Rafa would have to spend in the region of 430m in those first four season for it to have been comparable to what Alex spent. So lets say Alex did make 5 million back that would still leave net spend 7.25m or around a net spend of 255m (Average 64m a season) today going on club valuations.
Rafa spent 228 in his first four year of which he recouped 149 which is a net spend of 79m(Average 20m a season) and on what planet are those % net spends similar ?
All that is not even taking into account that Alex managed to win nothing in first 4 seasons and had spectacular league finishes of 2nd, 11th, 13th, 6th.
Rafa in the same time period won the champions league, Won the FA cup, got to another Champions league final and in the league finished 5th, 3rd, 3rd, 4th.
Opr
Comment
-
Originally posted by mdoug View Postwent to doctor today, throat ear and kidney infection all at the same time....
running bad
wife/gf or mother shouting in your ear at wasting your time playing the pokers
and for the kidney try pissing more often
"Remember the time he ate my goldfish? And you lied and said I never had goldfish. Then why did I have the bowl, Bart? Why did I have the bowl?"
Comment
Comment