...
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Bad Beat/Moaning/Venting - pray for Lazare
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Guest
-
Originally posted by Emmet View PostAnd I'm assuming that reasonableness is not in any way well defined?
Defining stuff is not how the world works.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Emmet View Post
And so back to the real world, in the case that Transdev do not bid for the tender in coming years, that a new tenderer could make an argument against the deal that was agreed yesterday, so long as they were able to demonstrate that it was not reasonable? (comparing it to similar roles in similar economies, similar roles within the same economy etc).
One would not find it difficult from a 'Free Market' perspective to make the case that the salary that they were already on (5 months ago) was unreasonable, let alone the LC recommended increases.
On your second para, that the LC have made a recommendation, which both parties have agreed (and not appealed/refused etc), would of itself indicate reasonableness into the future.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Solskjaer View PostElvis being the king and Ali the greatest. Two things I've never agreed with my fellow earthlings about. Ali though had the best personality in boxing .
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hitchhiker's Guide To... View PostDidn't realise there was ways around it.
Nowadays, thanks to advances in medical science, even that is open to argument and interpretation.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Lplated View PostCan't see the argument in your first para flying at all - after a few years the deal would become practice, normal, expected, which in turn is a component of 'reasonable' in any given context. Easily distinguished from the treble salaries example which was being done in clear sight of the change of contract.
A new tender holder coming in will not be compelled to fulfil that pay increase in their first year of holding the tender.
I am not making any claim about the increases that Transdev have agreed to give during the time of the contract that they currently hold.
Originally posted by Lplated View PostOn your second para, that the LC have made a recommendation, which both parties have agreed (and not appealed/refused etc), would of itself indicate reasonableness into the future.
Pretty reasonable argument no?
Comment
-
Originally posted by LuckyLloyd View PostThing is, they didn't lose. Nor does it look like they lost. The moral weight of the driver's demands and your feelings on Unions is a separate issue to the analysis of the terms they received. To put it another way - thinking the strike was abhorrent yet the drivers achieved a good outcome from same is not mutually exclusive.
I do feel sometimes that the quality of political debate on here has lowered over the past couple of years due to people who are capable of disassociating their preferences from their analysis increasingly choosing to cheerlead rather than discuss.
Joining the outcome of this dispute with the sentence 'great opportunity to break the unions' really is reaching. I have NEVER personally seen a strike with less public support and yet the drivers get a decent raise for no productivity increase at the end of it and the LC recommendation essentially says that all docked wages, etc should be paid back by their employer - i.e. they shouldn't be out of pocket for having to stand their ground to get the terms they got. Dublin Bus will be issuing the pay rises promised a couple of years ago sharpish or the NRBU will be balloting for strike action very soon imo...
I assume there is a dig there, but I'm not sure what it is.
It is excellent money for the job they do so to a certain extent fair play to the, for getting such a cushy number.
If this leads to successful pay claims by all unions where do you think the money to,cover it will come from. We have strict borrowing restrictions now. Infra investment, hiring freezes, cutting services etc etc.
We simply can't afford to pay more, all ps employees are on increments so it's not as if they don't get regular pay rises even if they are small. Trade off for security.
The perception will be the union rolled back, it will be reported e unions rolled back and the precident is now that the unions rolled back.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Emmet View PostI think we're discussing two different things here. I have stated that the increase promised to drivers in 4 years time, which Transdev has signed up to after the LC has recommended it, doesn't offer the drivers any protection from the tendering as Lloyd has stated (unless in the case where Transdev win the tender of course).
A new tender holder coming in will not be compelled to fulfil that pay increase in their first year of holding the tender.
The only way around it, for the new tenderer, were if it could somehow be considered NOT to be the same undertaking, which as I previously suggested, would involve something as outlandish as laying off all the staff, closing down for an extended period etc...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Emmet View Post
No it doesn't? All new tenderer has to do is express that they believe that Transdev included a % pay increase occurring in a year beyond the duration of the contract they had signed up to in an attempt to keep that contract. Given that they don't tender for the contract next time round, it is easy to present the case that they never intended to actually gift that increase as they had no intention of being party to the contract in that year.
Pretty reasonable argument no?
In four or five years time, or whenever, the employees terms and conditions will include the deal recommended and agreed yesterday. It is precisely that (the t & c) that a court would protect, unless they were in some unreasonable - but unreasonable in that context doesn't mean can you come up an argument against it, it means something as extreme as your hypothetical about trebling the salaries in the year before departure.
Comment
-
Originally posted by LuckyLloyd View PostAli was an incredibly polarizing figure during his career if that helps? A generally positive narrative eventually won out and became the perception of him but he would have had plenty of people hoping he lost fights and journalists who weren't drinking the kool aid at the time."I can’t find anyone who agrees with what I write or think these days, so I guess I must be getting closer to the truth." - Hunter S. Thompson
Comment
-
Originally posted by PSV58 View PostTransdev being defeated by button mashers ,they lost 700k on Luas last year,must not be very good businesspeople.
Previous week we were looking at getting to Edinburgh and return flights for me were €100 but a train from London was running at £280 return
Something seriously askew with public transport pricing policy.Turning millions into thousands
Comment
-
Originally posted by Lplated View PostThe LC recommendation, as now agreed by both sides, would be wholly binding on any new tenderer. It is now part of the terms of employment.
If Transdev offered them 2% y-o-y increase for 40 years and they sign it, then every tenderer from now to 2056 would be bound to pay that?
Consider that Transdev have 3 years remaining on their contract. The contract goes to tender in 3 years time.Last edited by Emmet; 04-06-16, 12:31.
Comment
-
The big takeaway from the Brexit debate thus far is the inability of modern media to handle such an important debate where the stakes are high and one side is relying more on emotional appeals and scare mongering. This is a strange new world, and the combination of an ever less effective traditional media with the bunkering and confirmation bias of social / new media is gradually poisoning our ability to critically interpret the world around us."Worldly wisdom teaches that it is better for reputation to fail conventionally than to succeed unconventionally." - John Maynard Keynes
Comment
-
Originally posted by LuckyLloyd View Posthttp://www.irishtimes.com/culture/tv...owry-1.2672236
The big takeaway from the Brexit debate thus far is the inability of modern media to handle such an important debate where the stakes are high andone side isboth sides are relying more on emotional appeals and scare mongering. This is a strange new world, and the combination of an ever less effective traditional media with the bunkering and confirmation bias of social / new media is gradually poisoning our ability to critically interpret the world around us.
It's battle of the grimness.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Strewelpeter View PostThis week when I decided to go to the T20 game in Southampton I assumed I'd go on the train and being able to sit back and relax was part of the attraction of going. First allsorts of complications in getting the last few miles popped up but even if they were surmountable the big issue was that it cost significantly less to hire a car and drive myself, in fact hiring a car and driver wouldn't have been much more expensive than the train.
Previous week we were looking at getting to Edinburgh and return flights for me were €100 but a train from London was running at £280 return
Something seriously askew with public transport pricing policy."Worldly wisdom teaches that it is better for reputation to fail conventionally than to succeed unconventionally." - John Maynard Keynes
Comment
-
Originally posted by LuckyLloyd View PostTrain prices in the UK and service levels are a strong argument against privatisation of an essential public service imo.
The issue is where some operators have exclusive lines.
Anything on page 50 of here are far better off.
They need to open up the lines better.
Comment
-
Originally posted by RichieM View PostI agree with what you are saying about the actual outcome being in favour of the drivers but perception in general will be that they had to go back to what was originally offered - thus a loss.
It is excellent money for the job they do so to a certain extent fair play to the, for getting such a cushy number.
If this leads to successful pay claims by all unions where do you think the money to,cover it will come from. We have strict borrowing restrictions now. Infra investment, hiring freezes, cutting services etc etc.
We simply can't afford to pay more, all ps employees are on increments so it's not as if they don't get regular pay rises even if they are small. Trade off for security.
The perception will be the union rolled back, it will be reported e unions rolled back and the precident is now that the unions rolled back.
As to the rest - either we have the fastest growing economy in Europe and falling unemployment rates or it's all a mirage. But assuming it's the former people will be looking for their slice. There's no point pretending otherwise!"Worldly wisdom teaches that it is better for reputation to fail conventionally than to succeed unconventionally." - John Maynard Keynes
Comment
-
Originally posted by LuckyLloyd View Postone side is relying more on emotional appeals and scare mongering.
The entire substance of the leave campaign is based on an emotional appeal to some weird notion of a mythical Olde England and a genuinely scary level of fear and loathing directed at immigrants.Turning millions into thousands
Comment
-
Originally posted by Emmet View PostTrain prices and service levels in the lines that are not monopoly owned are fantastic.
The issue is where some operators have exclusive lines.
Anything on page 50 of here are far better off.
They need to open up the lines better.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/n...th-worlds.html"Worldly wisdom teaches that it is better for reputation to fail conventionally than to succeed unconventionally." - John Maynard Keynes
Comment
-
Originally posted by Strewelpeter View PostUnless you mean the leave side this is the wrongest thing you've said in a while... a couple of hours at least
The entire substance of the leave campaign is based on an emotional appeal to some weird notion of a mythical Olde England and a genuinely scary level of fear and loathing directed at immigrants."Worldly wisdom teaches that it is better for reputation to fail conventionally than to succeed unconventionally." - John Maynard Keynes
Comment
-
Originally posted by LuckyLloyd View Posthttp://www.irishtimes.com/culture/tv...owry-1.2672236
The big takeaway from the Brexit debate thus far is the inability of modern media to handle such an important debate where the stakes are high and one side is relying more on emotional appeals and scare mongering. This is a strange new world, and the combination of an ever less effective traditional media with the bunkering and confirmation bias of social / new media is gradually poisoning our ability to critically interpret the world around us.
Comment
-
Guest
-
When asked by the locals I'm not offering an opinion on Brexit instead I'm asking them two questions:
Do you think the customs posts, security checks and passport control at the land border should be built at the RoI/UK border or would you just cut off Northern Ireland and make UK citizens produce passports internally?
Do you think that Scotland will want to leave the EU?
So far I haven't met anyone who even realised that a land border was an issue or that Brexit could lead to breakup of the UK with Scotland NI or even Wales leaving. Mostly people seem to be operating completely on some very weird emotional responses and no great application of thought or logic.Last edited by Strewelpeter; 04-06-16, 13:06.Turning millions into thousands
Comment
-
Guest
Originally posted by Strewelpeter View PostWhen asked by the locals I'm not offering an opinion on Brexit instead I'm asking them two questions:
Do you think the customs posts, security checks and passport control at the land border should be built at the RoI/UK border or would you just cut off Northern Ireland and make UK citizens produce passports internally?
Do you think that Scotland will want to leave the EU?
So far I haven't met anyone who even realised that a land border was an issue or that Brexit could lead to breakup of the UK with Scotland NI or even Wales leaving. Mostly people seem to be operating completely on some very weird emotional responses and no great application of thought or logic.
Usually gets an as a response from yer average would be Brexiter
Last edited by Guest; 04-06-16, 13:18.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Emmet View PostIncluding pay increases Transdev have signed up to that are scheduled outside of the contract that Transdev hold?
If Transdev offered them 2% y-o-y increase for 40 years and they sign it, then every tenderer from now to 2056 would be bound to pay that?
Consider that Transdev have 3 years remaining on their contract. The contract goes to tender in 3 years time.
Second part is so unusual - i.e. a set increase guaranteed for 40 years, that it is almost certainly unreasonable and wouldn't be binding.
Just to preempt your next move - the timeline, i.e. three year run to 40 year run, would be a factor, but only one factor. The extent of the concept of reasonableness is limited only by the inventiveness of the judge.
So, three years, probably ok, forty years definately not. But if you asked about 10 years, I would be unsure.
Comment
-
Guest
Originally posted by Strewelpeter View PostWhen asked by the locals I'm not offering an opinion on Brexit instead I'm asking them two questions:
Do you think the customs posts, security checks and passport control at the land border should be built at the RoI/UK border or would you just cut off Northern Ireland and make UK citizens produce passports internally?
Do you think that Scotland will want to leave the EU?
Comment
-
Originally posted by LuckyLloyd View PostThey look like a collection of high demand commuter services - I don't doubt the N11 corridor in Dublin would be better served in a privatised transport environment. The issue is consistency and quality of service as a whole. Certainly anyone I know living in the UK (and they're not all lefties) have a very negative perception of National rail services.
Then those who live in a small catchment area travelling to a slightly larger urban centre sometimes seem to expect miracles, rather than the functioning system (non express trains on an infrequent timetable) that they get.
Just cause people complain doesn't mean they are right.
Comment
-
Originally posted by AndyFatBastard View PostYeah and this was all happening against the backdrop of the civil rights movement. There were also tons of people who despised him for being outspoken and black.
Comment
-
Hot girls are solar powered Denny!This may or may not be an original thought of my own.
All efforts were made to make this thought original but with the abundance of thoughts in the world the originality of this thought cannot be guaranteed.
The author is not liable for any issue arising from the platitudinous nature of this post.
Comment
-
George Foreman vs Muhammad Ali - George Foreman defends the Heavyweight Championship of the World for the third time against former Champion, Muhammad Ali. A...
Essential viewing this weekend. Fascinating to see how the fight is covered and presented and the bedlam in the ring after (and the slightly shambolic preamble)."Worldly wisdom teaches that it is better for reputation to fail conventionally than to succeed unconventionally." - John Maynard Keynes
Comment
-
Originally posted by rounders123 View PostIve only now copped that GOAT stands for Greatest Of All Time thanks to Gary Players tribute to Ali haha!. Always just thought it was a figure of speech for the best.
Bless us and save usGone full 'Glinner' since June 2022.
Comment
-
Originally posted by 5starpool View PostWent down to Powerscourt Waterfall earlier for a couple of hours. Absolutely beautiful down there, amazing that I never considered the 40 min drive it took to get there before today. Loads of people about as well.
Comment
-
Originally posted by CourierCollie View PostReminds me of asking RD3 what GOP stands for. Must have heard it all my life, and just never even wondered what it meant. It's like some kind of weird cognitive blindness.
Although I was never quite sure of the origins so just looked it up.
"We are not Europeans. Those people on the continent are freaks."
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mellor View PostYou can't come out with something like that and not offer your alternative. Who is/was the greatest in your eyes?
Best bio . Joe Louis .
Better than Elvis ? Many of his black peers .
I loved Joe Frazier and Ali was a prick to him
Elvis was a hero for doing something that Ali was a hero for NOT doing.
I reserve the right to be wrong.Last edited by Solskjaer; 04-06-16, 18:06.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mickey Rosa View PostThis drone flying is addictive...
SPOILER
Where would one purchase such an item.?
Ball park price?
How long does the battery last?
Is it noisy while flying?
Sorry for all the questions, but I want one now
Ps, Super picture btw.
Comment
-
Arsenal trigger Vadry release cause for £20million.People say I should be more humble I hope they understand, they don't listen when you mumble
Get a shiny metal Revolut card! And a free tenner!
https://revolut.com/referral/jamesb8!G10D21
Comment
-
Originally posted by Keane View PostAnyone heard from zod lately?
You have just triggered a Where was TylerDurden special edition, featuring Zod.
At 2:45 today Zod got on a number 14 bus on Amiens Street, heading north. He chose to stand, and spent the entire time I was spying on him typing messages on a social media site, possibly Facebook, on his phone. He was wearing a grey hooded top, which looked a bit warm for the day that was in it.
Thanks for tuning in.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Fiery Wasabi View PostCan you post a picture of the drone?
Where would one purchase such an item.?
Ball park price?
How long does the battery last?
Is it noisy while flying?
Sorry for all the questions, but I want one now
Ps, Super picture btw.
The battery lasts a maximum of 28mins and the drone will return to where it took off from when the battery gets too low. It can go up to about 1300ft (legally in Ireland you can't go over 400ft) and can travel up to 5km away from you (again in Ireland legally you have to keep it in your sight line). It's as noisy in flight as you'd probably expect from something that powerful.
There are tons of reviews etc on youtube.The sport that unites Catholic, Protestant and dissenter has had its day of days. Pity anybody who can't enjoy it. Some day. Gerry Thornley 23/3/09
Comment
-
Originally posted by LuckyLloyd View Posthttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=55AasOJZzDE
Essential viewing this weekend. Fascinating to see how the fight is covered and presented and the bedlam in the ring after (and the slightly shambolic preamble).
Gone full 'Glinner' since June 2022.
Comment
-
Originally posted by RichieM View PostI agree with what you are saying about the actual outcome being in favour of the drivers but perception in general will be that they had to go back to what was originally offered - thus a loss.
It is excellent money for the job they do so to a certain extent fair play to the, for getting such a cushy number.
Why do you feel it's a cushy number? Sounds like a stressful and boring job to me.
If this leads to successful pay claims by all unions where do you think the money to,cover it will come from. We have strict borrowing restrictions now. Infra investment, hiring freezes, cutting services etc etc.
Why are you worried about where the money comes from? That's for the government to figure out. Maybe if we didn't bail out the banks it wouldn't be a concern. It's that kind of thinking that keeps people underpaid for the jobs that they do (not specifically Luas employees).
We simply can't afford to pay more, all ps employees are on increments so it's not as if they don't get regular pay rises even if they are small. Trade off for security.
Who is this "we"? Do you work for Transdev?
So the increments are keeping up with inflation, rent prices, property prices.
The perception will be the union rolled back, it will be reported e unions rolled back and the precident is now that the unions rolled back.
Comment
Comment