So, to try and respond a little less emotively.
I think anyone with the inclination to understand my opinion and POV, to actually understand why I am emotive, can understand why if they actually read my posts.
I think It is an extremely dangerous, and invasive overreach, for gov/pharma/tech (essentially this has become one arm) to suspend or take peoples right to work away if the want to choose what goes into their body. It's that simple. A lot of you seem to agree, that it should be a personal choice, but dont view that implicit coercion as not making it a choice, in what my definition of the word is.
I wont be responding to anything else. Actually finding this whole exchange quite traumatic as I am quite a sensitive person.
I believe we have a right to decide what goes into our body. I dont think our rights, to x y or z should be dependant on that. That's it.
I think anyone with the inclination to understand my opinion and POV, to actually understand why I am emotive, can understand why if they actually read my posts.
I think It is an extremely dangerous, and invasive overreach, for gov/pharma/tech (essentially this has become one arm) to suspend or take peoples right to work away if the want to choose what goes into their body. It's that simple. A lot of you seem to agree, that it should be a personal choice, but dont view that implicit coercion as not making it a choice, in what my definition of the word is.
I wont be responding to anything else. Actually finding this whole exchange quite traumatic as I am quite a sensitive person.
I believe we have a right to decide what goes into our body. I dont think our rights, to x y or z should be dependant on that. That's it.
Comment