Hi all. Bit of a strange one from a pub game last week. I'm guessing the answer is obvious, but just looking for confirmation.
Just the small blind and big blind involved in the hand.
SB checks on the flop. BB also checks.
Turn comes. SB checks. BB bets. SB calls.
River. SB checks. BB also checks.
SB, presuming he's beaten, now refuses to show his hand. Insists that the last aggressor has to show first, and that the last aggressor is the BB due to the bet on the turn.
Everyone's a bit bemused. BB shows his hand anyway. SB mucks without showing at all. Says he's not giving away information on what he played, without anybody paying for that info.
Still, surely since it was the river, he checked first, and there was only a check behind him, he's supposed to show first anyway?
Just the small blind and big blind involved in the hand.
SB checks on the flop. BB also checks.
Turn comes. SB checks. BB bets. SB calls.
River. SB checks. BB also checks.
SB, presuming he's beaten, now refuses to show his hand. Insists that the last aggressor has to show first, and that the last aggressor is the BB due to the bet on the turn.
Everyone's a bit bemused. BB shows his hand anyway. SB mucks without showing at all. Says he's not giving away information on what he played, without anybody paying for that info.
Still, surely since it was the river, he checked first, and there was only a check behind him, he's supposed to show first anyway?
Comment