Just a situation which occurred on a cash table last night which maybe shouldn't of been allowed happen in a 3 way pot?
3 players end up all in on the flop. Player 1 has less chips than the other 2 which leads to a side pot. All 3 players agree to run the turn n river twice. Player 1 has a straight draw, player 2 a flush draw n player 3 a straight. On the 1st run player 2 hits his flush. On the second run player 1 hits a straight equal to player 3 and player 2 blanks. No question about the side pot it's chopped 50/50. The main pot is where the problem occurred n I'd appreciated opinions on the ruling,
Agruement 1: player 2 wins 50% of the main pot n the other 2 chop the other 50%?
Argument 2: all 3 players get an equal share of the main pot?
3 players end up all in on the flop. Player 1 has less chips than the other 2 which leads to a side pot. All 3 players agree to run the turn n river twice. Player 1 has a straight draw, player 2 a flush draw n player 3 a straight. On the 1st run player 2 hits his flush. On the second run player 1 hits a straight equal to player 3 and player 2 blanks. No question about the side pot it's chopped 50/50. The main pot is where the problem occurred n I'd appreciated opinions on the ruling,
Agruement 1: player 2 wins 50% of the main pot n the other 2 chop the other 50%?
Argument 2: all 3 players get an equal share of the main pot?
Comment