After seen a hand played out and not been a poker pro on nlh cash game rules , I have a question to ask!
2 guys get it all in pre flop on a full ring game.
Small stack is 128€. ( very drunk also )
Bigger stack is reg.
So reg ask to run flop three times.
After 5 mins explaining to small stack how it works he agrees.
Both players reveal
Small stack = j8 off
Big stack = 66
New dealer approaches table waiting to swap.
Deal 1, k k k x x
Deal 2, 8 4 3 x x
Everyone at table announces (players ) 1 each.
Deal 3, j 4 8 x (6)
Everyone (players) announce 2 pair including dealer.
Dealer announces big stack wins 1 third and small stack wins 2 thirds.
2 thirds shipped to small stack ( who is very drunk and hasn't a clue what happened) and he's happy.
1 third shipped to big stack (who is also very drunk) and missed the dealer declare hand 3 as 2 pair wins.
He takes his chips in and dealers swap.
As next hand dealt and half played big stack asks where is the rest of his chips as he should have won 2 thirds.
Most people seen only 2 pair and agreed small stack won but the dealer who had left was in deep conversation with the floor away from the table that he had made a mistake.( and missed the 6)
At same time big stack is piped up asking for camera to be checked as he had seen a 6(set) on last board and one or two others did too.
Floor approaches table and asks for quiet.
He exclaims that there was a mistake and the dealer paid out wrong. Stating the dealer declared big stack as winner of 2 thirds and small stack as winner of 1 third but paying out opposite way....
As you can see the floor was not stating facts.
Yes the small stack had best hand 1 time but the dealer declared and gave him the chips . As he was very drink and everyone congratulated him he took chips in.
After a lot of back and forth €83 was taking from small stack and given to big stack.
Did the floor need to lie about dealer giving chips out the wrong way to get them back?
If he was sober and said no the dealer declared me winner where would he stand?
Cameras were checked to see that a set should have won.
Dealer admitted to mistake but not how he made it.
2 guys get it all in pre flop on a full ring game.
Small stack is 128€. ( very drunk also )
Bigger stack is reg.
So reg ask to run flop three times.
After 5 mins explaining to small stack how it works he agrees.
Both players reveal
Small stack = j8 off
Big stack = 66
New dealer approaches table waiting to swap.
Deal 1, k k k x x
Deal 2, 8 4 3 x x
Everyone at table announces (players ) 1 each.
Deal 3, j 4 8 x (6)
Everyone (players) announce 2 pair including dealer.
Dealer announces big stack wins 1 third and small stack wins 2 thirds.
2 thirds shipped to small stack ( who is very drunk and hasn't a clue what happened) and he's happy.
1 third shipped to big stack (who is also very drunk) and missed the dealer declare hand 3 as 2 pair wins.
He takes his chips in and dealers swap.
As next hand dealt and half played big stack asks where is the rest of his chips as he should have won 2 thirds.
Most people seen only 2 pair and agreed small stack won but the dealer who had left was in deep conversation with the floor away from the table that he had made a mistake.( and missed the 6)
At same time big stack is piped up asking for camera to be checked as he had seen a 6(set) on last board and one or two others did too.
Floor approaches table and asks for quiet.
He exclaims that there was a mistake and the dealer paid out wrong. Stating the dealer declared big stack as winner of 2 thirds and small stack as winner of 1 third but paying out opposite way....
As you can see the floor was not stating facts.
Yes the small stack had best hand 1 time but the dealer declared and gave him the chips . As he was very drink and everyone congratulated him he took chips in.
After a lot of back and forth €83 was taking from small stack and given to big stack.
Did the floor need to lie about dealer giving chips out the wrong way to get them back?
If he was sober and said no the dealer declared me winner where would he stand?
Cameras were checked to see that a set should have won.
Dealer admitted to mistake but not how he made it.
Comment