Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

triple chance PLO and NLH full stack?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    triple chance PLO and NLH full stack?

    Looking for credible reasons why I should or shouldn't take a full stack to the table in a double or triple chance PLO or NLH game, I know the obvious reasons for both sanarios ie bigger double ups and if unlucky extra chance to stay in etc etc. Percentage wise what is the right thing to do?

    #2
    The correct approach will depend on variables including:

    Your edge [or lack thereof] over the table/field
    Table dynamics
    Strategy of other players
    Blind levels/Tournament structure
    Your bank roll & attitude to risk
    Frequency of table changes/breaking
    You motivation for playing - i.e. would you like more table time vs. a bigger chance of the outright win
    Your playing background/style - i.e. how well do you play different stack sizes

    A mistake many players make in these events is failing to either [A.] punt or [B.] put the additional lammers in play early on, so they effectively play the event as a starting stack + double top up, which is a massive mistake.

    Many might prefer to take a few orbits to observe what is going on at the table, and then make a decision...
    Last edited by colm_leche; 07-09-15, 14:08.

    Comment


      #3
      Generally, if even 1 person buys in for the full stack, i will too. If everyone sits on their first stack, then i'll also do it but once someone doubles up, i'll grab another stack.

      Omaha is a bit more 'gamble gamble' so you might fancy punting on a couple of draws early on knowing you have some stacks behind, and this is fine. It is a re-entry though, so i'd be more inclined to get the full stack (as above) and take some early gambles with 1st stack.

      Comment


        #4
        Cheers lads

        Comment

        Working...
        X