I thought this one was going to end up here and since it didn't I've decided i'd put it up myself.
At the beginning of each starting day at the IPO I announce that we were using TDA rules with the exception of...
16: Showdown Order & 46: Accepted Action
On Day 1C (i think) a player comes up to at the start of the dinner break. The last hand before the dinner break he was involved in the following hand.
I'm not sure what the blinds were or were the button was. I believe the button was in seats 2-4 but it's not important.
Preflop action is folded to seat 8 who goes all-in for 9,200, seat 9 folds, seat 10 goes all in for approx 80k, seat 1 folds, seat 2 places 2 x 5k (he has approx 65k) chips into the pot and this then brought to his attention that seat 10 has gone all for for 80k (which covers him).
Seat 2 goes to fold and leaves his chips out there.
The floor is call he is forced to call the all-in bet. Player in seat 2 questions the ruling and is clearly not happy about it. He has pocket 5's, seat 10 Aces and he is knocked out of the tournament.
If I was called I would have ruled differently. I would have left the 9,200 in the pot and given the option to call or fold.
Seat 2 finds me during the break and asks me about the ruling.
What would you do?
BTW this rule is covered by Accepted Action.
At the beginning of each starting day at the IPO I announce that we were using TDA rules with the exception of...
16: Showdown Order & 46: Accepted Action
On Day 1C (i think) a player comes up to at the start of the dinner break. The last hand before the dinner break he was involved in the following hand.
I'm not sure what the blinds were or were the button was. I believe the button was in seats 2-4 but it's not important.
Preflop action is folded to seat 8 who goes all-in for 9,200, seat 9 folds, seat 10 goes all in for approx 80k, seat 1 folds, seat 2 places 2 x 5k (he has approx 65k) chips into the pot and this then brought to his attention that seat 10 has gone all for for 80k (which covers him).
Seat 2 goes to fold and leaves his chips out there.
The floor is call he is forced to call the all-in bet. Player in seat 2 questions the ruling and is clearly not happy about it. He has pocket 5's, seat 10 Aces and he is knocked out of the tournament.
If I was called I would have ruled differently. I would have left the 9,200 in the pot and given the option to call or fold.
Seat 2 finds me during the break and asks me about the ruling.
What would you do?
BTW this rule is covered by Accepted Action.
Comment