Just curious as to what the correct ruling is in this situation......
Not sure of exact numbers so a quick summary....
HJ opens & i 3 bet in CO (all standard so far), both playing about 20% over average stack.
HJ then 4 bets but with an increment raise rather than double my bet. I respond with an incremental 5 bet.
Now on reflection i do know that the Fitz plays the "double the last bet" rule but in the heat of the hand & coming off 2 weeks in Citywest this was overlooked by both of us (other player very competent).
My intention with the 5 bet was to fold to a shove. Another player then alerts the dealer to my incremental bet which in turn leads to questions about the HJs previous incremental bet.
Floor is called and its ruled that his 4 bet must be double my bet & my 5 bet must be double his new amount.
Now this puts me in trouble with my intended course of action as my new forced bet is now a substantially higher proportion of my stack leaving me with no fold option to a shove imo.
Baring in mind my opponent hasn't acted yet to this new bet that is incoming I am trying to ascertain do I have all my options from the floorstaff member without giving away my hand strength/intention to my opponent but floor is only interested in making me put out the new amount.
Anyway tl/dr - due to the action being pulled back and a new higher bet amount coming into play on his 4 bet, should this give me all my options back? ( i don't know if it matters but i never spoke, i.e said "raise" etc)
PS - any chance of the Fitz arriving into this century regarding incremental raises?
Not sure of exact numbers so a quick summary....
HJ opens & i 3 bet in CO (all standard so far), both playing about 20% over average stack.
HJ then 4 bets but with an increment raise rather than double my bet. I respond with an incremental 5 bet.
Now on reflection i do know that the Fitz plays the "double the last bet" rule but in the heat of the hand & coming off 2 weeks in Citywest this was overlooked by both of us (other player very competent).
My intention with the 5 bet was to fold to a shove. Another player then alerts the dealer to my incremental bet which in turn leads to questions about the HJs previous incremental bet.
Floor is called and its ruled that his 4 bet must be double my bet & my 5 bet must be double his new amount.
Now this puts me in trouble with my intended course of action as my new forced bet is now a substantially higher proportion of my stack leaving me with no fold option to a shove imo.
Baring in mind my opponent hasn't acted yet to this new bet that is incoming I am trying to ascertain do I have all my options from the floorstaff member without giving away my hand strength/intention to my opponent but floor is only interested in making me put out the new amount.
Anyway tl/dr - due to the action being pulled back and a new higher bet amount coming into play on his 4 bet, should this give me all my options back? ( i don't know if it matters but i never spoke, i.e said "raise" etc)
PS - any chance of the Fitz arriving into this century regarding incremental raises?
Comment