Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Multiway pot OOP. Too passive?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Multiway pot OOP. Too passive?

    Am I too passive here?

    PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, 5.5 Tournament, 60/120 Blinds 15 Ante (9 handed) - Poker-Stars Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com

    MP3 (t5585)
    CO (t5376)
    Button (t7145)
    Hero (SB) (t18320)
    BB (t10710)
    UTG (t10710)
    UTG+1 (t10480)
    MP1 (t13389)
    MP2 (t7420)

    Hero's M: 58.16

    Preflop: Hero is SB with A, J
    2 folds, MP1 bets t280, 1 fold, MP3 calls t280, 2 folds, Hero calls t220, 1 fold

    Flop: (t1095) 5, 10, A (3 players)
    Hero checks, MP1 checks, MP3 bets t360, Hero calls t360, 1 fold

    Turn: (t1815) 4 (2 players)
    Hero checks, MP3 bets t600, Hero calls t600

    River: (t3015) 4 (2 players)
    Hero checks, MP3 checks

    Total pot: t3015

    Results:
    Hero had A, J (two pair, Aces and fours).
    MP3 mucked Q, K (one pair, fours).
    Outcome: Hero won t3015
    Last edited by gorrrr72; 25-03-10, 10:30.

    #2
    I think it's fine, nh.

    Comment


      #3
      preflop is a fold against most. postflop is fine, but it shows you why calling and hoping to flop a bliff catcher sucks.
      Looking for full or part time poker and betting writers. PM if interested.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by ianmc38 View Post
        preflop is a fold against most. postflop is fine, but it shows you why calling and hoping to flop a bliff catcher sucks.
        What's your calling range in that spot then Ian? Isn't AJ a bit too strong to be folding, even if we're OOP?

        Comment

        Working...
        X